ReviewJournal of pain research2024
The Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of liposomal bupivacaine on subjective recovery quality after surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Intercostal nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine versus no regional analgesia after uniportal thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial.JTCVS open · 2026Trial
- Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Single-Injection Versus Dual-Injection Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Analgesic Effect After Dual-Microport Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Pain research & management · 2026Trial
- Liposomal Bupivacaine in Perioperative Analgesia: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Economic Context.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Optimizing Recovery After Thoracotomy: Evidence-Based Non-Opioid and Multimodal Analgesia - A Narrative Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Thoracic paravertebral block with liposomal bupivacaine versus ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Evolving Trends and Core Contributors: A Bibliometric Update on Liposomal Bupivacaine.Pain research & management · 2026Article
- Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Liposomal Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine, and Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia for Adult Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Retraospective Cohort Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- The impact of liposomal bupivacaine erector spinae plane block on postoperative analgesia and early functional recovery in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Liposomal bupivacaine in thoracic surgery: a comprehensive review of current evidence and clinical implications.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Acute postoperative pain management after cardiothoracic surgery: a bibliometric analysis and future directions.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Patients undergoing thoracic surgery suffer from severe postoperative pain, and a series of complications will occur if there is no effective analgesic treatment. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is a novel multivesicular formulation with up to 72 hours of analgesia, which can be used in thoracic surgery. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LB in improving recovery in patients undergoing thoracic surgery compared with non-liposomal local anesthetics. Patients and Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of science, and to identify all observational or retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to December 2023. The primary outcome was the in-hospital postsurgical opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Secondary outcomes included 24-hour postoperative MMEs, postoperative pain score in the first 24 and 48 hours, hospital length of stay (LOS), time to first ambulation, readmission, and perioperative complications. RevMan 5.3 was used for the data analysis. Results: A total of 10 studies were included in the analysis, of which eight were observational or retrospective analyses and two were RCTs. There were no significant differences in the postoperative MMEs, pain score, LOS, time to first ambulation, readmission, and perioperative complications. Conclusion: According to this meta-analysis, LB was found to be not superior to non-liposomal local anesthetics for analgesic and functional outcomes in thoracic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.