ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Complex aortic valve repair in congenital patients: clinical feedback.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the congenital population, particularly in young adults, the best strategy for aortic valve surgery has not been clearly established. This study investigates the mortality, perioperative morbidity and echocardiographic evolution of complex aortic valve repair techniques. Material and methods: We performed a retrospective monocentric descriptive study of patients operated at the Louis Pradel Hospital (Lyon) from 2017 to 2023. We included patients operated for complex aortic valve repair by the congenital heart surgery team, excluding simple commissurotomies. The primary endpoint was postoperative survival. The secondary endpoints were freedom from surgical reintervention and echocardiographic evolution of aortic regurgitation, aortic stenosis and annular diameter. The analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods. Results: Twenty-eight patients were included. The mean age was 11.1 years (range 1-35 years) and the mean weight was 37.5 kg (range 8.2-79 kg). The postoperative survival rate was 96.4% at discharge (27/28 patients). The mean follow-up interval was 35 months (range 14-79 months). At the end of the follow-up, the freedom from reoperation was 85.7%. Four patients underwent reoperation for worsening aortic valve and/or ventricular function (1 heart transplantation, 2 Ross procedures, 1 aortic valve replacement). Results on secondary endpoints showed a trend towards improvement in annular diameter postoperatively between pre- and postoperative echocardiography for each patient, with no statistically significant difference for aortic insufficiency, but for aortic stenosis ( Conclusion: This study shows an excellent survival rate, and a similar risk of reintervention compared with literature data. All the data described above argue in favor of an aortic valve repair surgery as a first line procedure in case of congenital heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.