ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2024
Individualized 3D printing for skin cancer brachytherapy: Development, implementation, clinical applications, and treatment assessment.
Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Patient-specific 3D-printed HDR surface brachytherapy for basal cell carcinoma in older patients: prospective feasibility and imaging response.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Revisiting Radiotherapy for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Clinical Outcomes, Safety, and Optimization Strategies: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Dosimetric evaluation of superficial radionuclide-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for deep keratinocyte carcinoma: A case series.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026Article
- Computed tomography-based customized surface mould high-dose-rate brachytherapy for non-melanoma skin cancer of the scalp and face. Long-term results: Optimizing for reduction of late toxicity and improving cosmetic outcome.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026Article
- Worldwide research on 3D printing for cancer: a dual-method analysis of bibliometrics and stratified focused thematic.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Review
- High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Dermatology: A Review with Emphasis on Skin Cancer Management and Prevention.Cancers · 2025Review
- Non-Invasive Imaging in Post-Radiotherapy Monitoring of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
- Targeted Radiotherapy in Primary Cutaneous Lymphomas: Precision, Efficacy, and Evolving Strategies.Cancers · 2025Review
- 3D-Printed Devices in Interventional Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy) Applications: A Literature Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study outlined the prevalent use of brachytherapy in skin cancers, such as basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The importance of customized applicator fabrication for optimal treatment delivery was highlighted, focusing on adaptable devices tailored to individual patient anatomy, often facilitated by 3D printing technology. The purpose of this work was to investigate the association of medical science and 3D printing in customized applicator fabrication for brachytherapy, leveraging the advancements in fabrication techniques to enhance treatment precision and patient outcomes. Material and methods: The study enrolled five patients with tumor lesions unsuitable for surgical intervention, situated across various anatomical locations, such as earlobe, temple, hand, and cheek. Customized applicators were fabricated Results: This study examined the therapeutic outcomes of brachytherapy in five patients with inoperable skin cancer lesions. Utilizing customized 3D-printed applicators, the patients underwent brachytherapy regimen delivering a cumulative dose of 51 Gy in 17 fractions. The evaluation with RTOG scale revealed varied treatment responses, with complete remission achieved in all cases. Reflectance confocal microscopy showed post-treatment normalization of epidermal morphology and notable scar formation. Optical profilometry demonstrated consistent micro-structures on the applicator surfaces, without compromising treatment efficacy. These findings indicated the potential of 3D-printed applicators in optimizing brachytherapy outcomes in skin cancer management. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of 3D-printed applicators in treating inoperable skin cancer lesions with high precision. In personalized fabrication, optimal conformity with anatomical features was achieved, resulting in complete remission in all patients. This approach minimizes treatment-related side effects and enhances overall patient outcomes, suggesting a promising future for 3D printing technology in skin cancer treatment applications. Further research and clinical validation are needed to establish 3D printing as a standard practice in skin cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.