Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629081›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Clinical and non-clinical aspects of reimbursement policy for orphan drugs in selected European countries.

Szczepan Jakubowski, Przemysław Holko, Rafał Nowak, Marisa Warmuth, Marc Dooms, Outi Salminen, Lucas Cortial, Gisbert W Selke, Christina Georgi, Einar Magnússon and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Szczepan JakubowskiDepartment of Health Promotion and e-Health, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Przemysław HolkoDepartment of Nutrition and Drug Research, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Rafał NowakDepartment of Nutrition and Drug Research, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Marisa WarmuthDepartment of Pharmaceutical Affairs, Federation of Social Insurances, Vienna, Austria.
Marc DoomsUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Outi SalminenDepartment for Steering of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Unit for Steering, Service Choices in Healthcare COHERE, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Lucas CortialOrphandev Fcrin Reference Network, Aix Marseille University, Assistance publique - Hopitaux de Marseille, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, Inst Neurosci Syst, CHU Timone, Marseille, France.
Gisbert W SelkeAOK Research Institute (WIdO), Berlin, Germany.
Christina GeorgiHealth Economics and Management Lab, Department of Economic Science, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece.
Einar MagnússonPharmaceutical Affairs Ministry of Health, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Salvatore CrisafulliDepartment of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Fons StrijboschSiRM - Strategies in Regulated Markets, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Tanja MuellerStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Eleanor GrieveHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Immaculada DanésClinical Pharmacology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.
Paweł KawalecDepartment of Nutrition and Drug Research, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the reimbursement policy for orphan drugs (ODs) in selected European countries in relation to the availability and impact of clinical evidence, health technology assessment (HTA) procedures and reimbursement decision-making. Materials and Methods: A list of authorized ODs was extracted from a web-based registry of the European Medicines Agency, including information on active substance, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification code, and therapeutic area. A country-based questionnaire survey was conducted between September 2022 and September 2023 among selected experts from 12 European countries. A descriptive and statistical analysis was performed to identify correlations between country characteristic, HTA procedures, drug indication and positive recommendations or reimbursement decisions for ODs. Results: Safety assessment for ODs was mandatory in 10 countries, while it was optional in one country (Italy) and not required in one country (Iceland). Efficacy assessment for ODs was mandatory in 11 countries and not required in one country (Iceland). The impact of safety and efficacy assessment on reimbursement decisions was rated as high in 10 countries and as low in one country (Germany). Dedicated OD legislation and policies were reported in seven countries. In two countries (Belgium, Iceland), the HTA was not mandatory, and in one country (Germany), it only had an informative function. A positive recommendation (from an HTA agency or advisory body) guaranteed reimbursement in four countries, while a negative recommendation excluded reimbursement only in one country (Iceland). The proportion of reimbursed ODs ranged from 23.5% in Iceland to 86% in Germany ( Conclusion: European countries differ in terms of the impact of clinical issues and additional clinical aspects on the reimbursement policy for ODs. Reimbursement decisions were affected by OD-specific legislation, policies, and EMA authorization status. HTA dossiers and procedures significantly influenced reimbursement decisions, although some ODs were reimbursed regardless of the positive or negative recommendations. ATC codes were significantly correlated with reimbursement status and positive recommendation.

Indexed as

clinicalEMAEuropeHTAorphan drugspolicyrare diseasesreimbursement

Identifiers

PMID39629081
PMCPMC11611580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.