Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629061›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2024

Blood Pressure Predicted From Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Retinal Images Correlates With Future Cardiovascular Events.

David M Squirrell, Song Yang, Li Xie, Songyang Ang, Mohammadi Moghadam, Ehsan Vaghefi, Michael V McConnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. AI-driven multimodal retinal imaging for early detection and risk stratification of vascular and neurodegenerative diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. The role of artificial intelligence in hypertension management.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David M SquirrellDivision of Artificial Intelligence, Toku Eyes, Auckland, New Zealand.
Song YangDivision of Artificial Intelligence, Toku Eyes, Auckland, New Zealand.
Li XieDivision of Artificial Intelligence, Toku Eyes, Auckland, New Zealand.
Songyang AngDivision of Artificial Intelligence, Toku Eyes, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mohammadi MoghadamDivision of Artificial Intelligence, Toku Eyes, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ehsan VaghefiDivision of Artificial Intelligence, Toku Eyes, Auckland, New Zealand.
Michael V McConnellDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High systolic blood pressure (SBP) is one of the leading modifiable risk factors for premature cardiovascular death. The retinal vasculature exhibits well-documented adaptations to high SBP and these vascular changes are known to correlate with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether using artificial intelligence (AI) to predict an individual's SBP from retinal images would more accurately correlate with future ASCVD events compared to measured SBP. Methods: 95,665 macula-centered retinal images drawn from the 51,778 individuals in the UK Biobank who had not experienced an ASCVD event prior to retinal imaging were used. A deep-learning model was trained to predict an individual's SBP. The correlation of subsequent ASCVD events with the AI-predicted SBP and the mean of the measured SBP acquired at the time of retinal imaging was determined and compared. Results: The overall ASCVD event rate observed was 3.4%. The correlation between SBP and future ASCVD events was significantly higher if the AI-predicted SBP was used compared to the measured SBP: 0.067 v 0.049, Conclusions: With the variability and challenges of real-world SBP measurement, AI analysis of retinal images may provide a more reliable and accurate biomarker for predicting future ASCVD events than traditionally measured SBP.

Indexed as

atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseblood pressure measurementdeep learningretinal vasculaturesystolic blood pressure

Identifiers

PMID39629061
PMCPMC11612377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.