ArticleHealth services insights2024
The Referrer Matters. Musculoskeletal Surgical Conversion Rates: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
Article in Health services insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- First Contact Physiotherapists (FCPs) Referral Practices to Rheumatology: A Scoping Review of the Evidence Base.Musculoskeletal care · 2026Article
- In safe hands - patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis expectations and experience of physical therapist-led triage in a secondary care setting.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Patient Decision Aids into Routine Orthopedic Care: Results from an Implementation Study at 12 Sites.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Efficient musculoskeletal care is important for health services and society. Surgical conversion rates are a common measure of efficiency, yet normal values and the impact of referrer type are unclear. This information could assist musculoskeletal care, service benchmarking and redesign. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was undertaken with PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE databases searched from inception to 12th of October 2024, to identify studies from which musculoskeletal surgical conversion rates could be extracted. Data were categorised according to the professional group responsible for referral (all doctors, general practitioners, sports physicians, allied-health/physiotherapy-led screening services) and methodology used to define surgical conversion. Meta-analysis of pooled data was undertaken. Results: Twenty-eight studies with a combined total of 5358 patients were included. Pooled data revealed surgical conversion rates of 23% for referrals from all types of doctors (0.23, 95% CI 0.18-0.27), 28% from general practitioners (0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.52), 61% from allied health physiotherapy-led screening services (0.61, CI 0.50-0.70) and 70% from sports physicians at (0.70, CI 0.64-0.75). A variety of methodological factors impacted surgical conversion rate reporting and heterogeneity. Conclusions: Musculoskeletal services seeking to improve efficiency through higher surgical conversion rates, should include sports physician and/or physiotherapy-led models of care for referral generation or management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.