ArticleHealth services insights2024
Out-of-Pocket Costs Burden in Marketplace Plans for People With Diabetes.
Article in Health services insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Financial Toxicity in Diabetes: The State of What We Know.Current diabetes reports · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) aims to expand coverage and increase access to health insurance. Despite the increase of insured individuals, there are a number of concerns about whether coverage and care are affordable. Prior studies document a growing concern with rising premiums and cost-sharing, including deductibles, particularly for those with chronic conditions. Objective: Compare the ACA marketplace plan availability and costs across 17 states for individuals with varying diabetic engagement profiles and their related medical needs. Design: Descriptive Cost Analysis. Methods: Using Healthcare.gov individual state marketplace websites, we utilized a descriptive cost analysis to compare plan availability and costs for premiums, deductibles, co-payments, and co-insurance for an individual aged 63 years old, who was either a non-diabetic, high-engagement or low-engagement diabetic in urban and rural areas. Using the second lowest monthly premium silver plan (the benchmark plan), we calculated annual costs for premiums, co-insurance, co-payments, and deductibles for these individual profiles. We assessed statistical differences between health care component costs, within and across urban and rural areas, using Results: The findings highlight within and across states, individuals with diabetes, particularly low-engagement diabetics, spend a significantly higher percent of their income on additional health care costs, above their premium, than non-diabetic individuals. In some states, low-engagement diabetic patients spend upwards of 3 times more than high-engagement diabetic patients, highlighting an additional cost burden. For low-engagement diabetics, deductibles are driving health care spending with an average of 59% of health care spending coming from deductible payments. Results do not show statistically different costs across urban and rural diabetic patients. Conclusion: Despite the ACA's success, results highlight variation in plan availability across states and disproportionate cost burden placed on moderate income individuals, especially related to deductible, and co-payments for those with chronic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.