Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629022›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2024

Integrating the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Tensions into a Novel Conceptual Model for Telehealth Advancement in Healthcare Organizations.

Jordan Scott Schweidenback, Pavani Rangachari, Sandra D'Amato-Palumbo, Joseph Scott Gladstone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jordan Scott SchweidenbackDepartment of Population Health and Leadership, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-1831-951X
Pavani RangachariDepartment of Population Health and Leadership, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9464-7299
Sandra D'Amato-PalumboDepartment of Allied Health, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT, USA.
Joseph Scott GladstoneCarson College of Business, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6661-2101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telehealth services have potential to enhance access to quality healthcare, reduce costs, and increase satisfaction for both patients and providers. As a disruptive healthcare innovation, telehealth disorders old systems and creates a new hybrid model of care that delivers significant value to stakeholders. However, the failure rate of innovation implementation in healthcare ranges from 30% to 90%, depending on the complexity involved. While researchers have conducted extensive studies on the barriers and facilitators to widespread innovation implementation, the root causes of innovation implementation failure in health services (eg, telehealth implementation failure) are not fully understood. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) introduced in 2009 has become increasingly popular as a framework for informing successful innovation implementation in health services. The CFIR identifies barriers and facilitators to innovation implementation across five domains of implementation-the innovation, individual, inner, outer, and process domains. However, it lacks a mechanism to capture the complex social challenges (tensions) underlying the barriers and facilitators that affect implementation success or failure. The Tensions framework supplies a foundation beyond barriers and facilitators to provide a dynamic understanding of the role of social conflicts impacting the implementation process. This paper presents a novel conceptual model,

Indexed as

consolidated framework for implementation researchinnovation implementationleadership strategiestelehealth implementationtensions in innovation processes

Identifiers

PMID39629022
PMCPMC11613697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.