ArticleFrontiers in oral health2024
Dentists' knowledge, attitude and practice towards silver diamine fluoride therapy in Hong Kong: a mixed-method study.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explored the knowledge, attitude, and practice towards silver diamine fluoride (SDF) therapy among dentists in Hong Kong. The quantitative component was an online closed-ended questionnaire survey through the Society of Preventive Dentistry of Hong Kong. The qualitative component involved individual in-depth interviews with selected dentists. Descriptive analysis was performed on the quantitative data, whereas thematic analysis was performed on the qualitative data. The quantitative study invited 173 dentists, and 86 completed the questionnaire survey (86/173; 50%). All respondents were familiar with SDF and 73 (73/86; 85%) used SDF. They agreed that SDF therapy was simple (84/86; 98%), non-invasive (84/86; 98%), timesaving (82/86; 96%), effective (81/86; 94%), and painless (79/86; 92%). However, they expressed concerns about SDF's unaesthetic staining (81/86; 94%) and used it for primary teeth (77/86; 89%). The qualitative study conducted 12 individual interviews. Dentists asserted that SDF therapy is an evidence-based practice for arresting caries, including root caries. They acknowledged SDF therapy is straightforward and cost-effective. It is particularly useful for children or people with disabilities and can be used in community service. They considered the application skills, close monitoring and maintaining good oral hygiene to be vital for the success of SDF therapy. However, they noted that black staining of the carious lesions could cause patient dissatisfaction. They suggested that a guideline is warranted for SDF use. Hong Kong dentists are aware of the indications, merits and limitations of SDF therapy. They use SDF therapy for caries control, especially for children, elderly and those with disabilities, and consider it cost-effective for community dental care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.