Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629012›Full record

ReviewAnimal reproduction2024

Equine ICSI: an update on semen perspective.

Rodrigo Arruda de Oliveira, Maria Augusta Alonso, Juliana Schleich Fonte, Claudia Barbosa Fernandes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal reproduction, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Does the Reproductive Technique Affect Neonatal Health Parameters in Foals?Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rodrigo Arruda de OliveiraLaboratório de Reprodução Animal, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-8267-9031
Maria Augusta AlonsoDepartamento de Reprodução Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9981-3834
Juliana Schleich FonteDepartamento de Reprodução Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-9331-9226
Claudia Barbosa FernandesDepartamento de Reprodução Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-4354-402X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) has increased usage in cases of stallion fertility issues, particularly for older stallions, those with reduced sperm numbers or quality, or stallions that have passed away, and only a limited amount of frozen semen is available. By manipulating the frozen semen through thawing, diluting, and refreezing or by cutting the straw under liquid nitrogen, the supply of semen for ICSI can be extended. While ICSI requires a minimal number of spermatozoa per procedure, it is important to consider sperm quality as a crucial factor affecting fertilization and embryo development. Although it is possible to produce healthy embryos and offspring from low quality sperm samples, it is preferable to process and select morphologically and functionally superior sperm to maximize the chances of successful fertilization and embryo development. Several techniques are available for selecting the spermatozoa for ICSI, such as swim-up, washing, density gradient centrifugation, microfluidic sorting, and some combinations. In this review, we will focus on semen type, handling, recent breakthroughs, stallion effects on ICSI efficiency and the prospects of this technology within the equine industry.

Indexed as

cut strawfertilizationfrozen semenstallionswim up

Identifiers

PMID39629012
PMCPMC11614134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.