Early Initiative of Structured Mentoring and Research for Social Disadvantage Trainees to Increase Diversity and Inclusion among Clinician Scientists.

Background: There is a significant lag in integrating ethnically diverse healthcare trainees as clinician scientists. Although this gap is acknowledged, it is mostly focused physician scientists with a marked lag in dental scientists and the other healthcare fields such as the physician assistant program. We report on the outcome of three cohorts of underserved and economically disadvantaged trainees from a National Institute of Health Heart and Lung Blood Institute R25 summer training program with participants from four Rutgers Health Science schools. Objective: The goal was to support inclusivity within clinician scientist workforce through career development and education. Methods: We tested the hypothesis that early formal training with structured mentoring, research, career development, and didactic lectures will inspire trainees towards careers as clinician scientists. Trainees learned from the integration of research within the four health profession schools. We used a survey to assess how mentorship, research and career/educational development influence trainees' attitude for careers as clinician scientists. Career development included science communication, mentoring, data reproducibility, authorship, ethics in research, and models of healthcare institutional leadership. Results: >80% of the trainees continued their engagement in research with peer-reviewed publications, with confidence to engage in scientific discussion. Trainees developed a sense of belonging and a psychological safety net as they integrate with other groups of academic fields with confidence. Among 29 contacts, 87% responded. Less than 10% of incoming trainees indicated research in their career plans, which changed to >90% after one summer. Conclusions: Overall, this training program could serve as a `blueprint' for other programs to enhance careers in research, and to narrow the diversity gap among clinician scientists. Diversity among clinician scientists will enhance healthcare and disparities, and scientific innovation. Success would narrow the diversity gap among clinician scientists.