ArticleFrontiers in surgery2024
Single-lung ventilation technique in neonates undergoing thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- [Navigation in troubled waters: lung separation in childhood].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracoscopic repair is a common surgical procedure to treat esophageal atresia (EA). During thoracoscopic surgery, the single-lung ventilation (SLV) technique is used to collapse one of the lungs to obtain a better surgical view. However, SLV is associated with risks in neonates. This study aimed to assess the perioperative benefits and risks of SLV in neonates who underwent thoracoscopic EA repair. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included all neonates who underwent thoracoscopic repair of EA at the Children's Hospital of Fudan University between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021. Neonates were assigned to SLV (Group S) or dual-lung ventilation (DLV, Group D) groups depending on the technique used intraoperatively. The intraoperative and postoperative information of the two groups were compared. Results: A total of 70 neonates were included in this study. Twenty-nine neonates were assigned to Group S and forty-one to Group D. No intraoperative adverse events were observed in either group. The surgery time of Group S was significantly shorter than that of Group D (81 ± 23 and 99 ± 29 min, respectively, Conclusion: SLV was associated with a reduced surgery time for thoracoscopic repair of EA and longer anesthetic preparation time compared to DLV. The SLV was as safe as the DLV with potential advantages in thoracoscopic EA repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.