ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Early minimally invasive image-guided eNdoscopic evacuation of iNTracerebral hemorrhage: a phase II pilot trial.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05681988 (Early Minimally Invasive Image Guided Endoscopic Evacuation of Intracerebral Haemorrhage), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Minimally Invasive Image Guided Endoscopic Evacuation of Intracerebral Haemorrhage (EMINENT-ICH): a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Seasonal variations in outcomes following spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a case control study.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Successful endoscopic evacuation of traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage: A report of two cases.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive surgery for bilateral large basal ganglia hemorrhage: a rare case report and insights from literature.AME case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Whether minimally invasive endoscopic surgery (ES) improves survival and functional outcome in people with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (SSICH) is unknown. Methods: This is a single-center pilot study performed between July 2021 to January 2023. Any supratentorial hematoma with a volume between 20 mL and 100 mL was endoscopically evacuated within 24 h after bleeding onset. Participants were followed-up for 6 months, assessing clinical and radiological outcomes. The primary feasibility outcome was satisfactory hematoma removal (<15 mL residual volume on the first postinterventional CT study) and the primary efficacy outcome was reaching a modified Rankin Scale 0-3 (mRS) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were mortality and morbidity rates. Results: Ten participants (median age 72.5 years [IQR 67-81], 70% male, median baseline hematoma volume 34.1 [IQR 25.5-58.0]) were included. Satisfactory hematoma evacuation was achieved in 70% (7/10) with a median evacuation percentage of 69.5% [IQR 45.3-93.9%]. The median duration of surgery was 91 min [IQR 73-111]. Favorable outcome at 6 months was observed in 60% of the participants and improved from within 24 h before the intervention to the last follow-up (6 months). Five participants (50%) experienced a total of six complications, two recurrent bleedings, three pneumonias and one epilepsy. Mortality rate was 30%, while one participant died from pneumonia, one from a recurrent bleeding, and one participant due to a glioblastoma. Conclusion: ES appears to be feasible, with satisfactory hematoma removal being achieved in the majority of participants. Based on the descriptive results of this pilot trial, a national multicenter RCT comparing ES to best medical treatment is currently ongoing. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT05681988.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.