ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Efgartigimod treatment in patients with anti-MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis in exacerbation.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Various Monoclonal Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of efgartigimod in myasthenia gravis: A meta-analysis of different antibody subtypes.Immunologic research · 2026Pooled it
- Real-world experience with efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis: a single-center retrospective study in China.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- MuSK myasthenia gravis: from antigen-antibody to clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Management of Myasthenic Crisis and Emerging Roles of Molecularly Targeted Therapies: A Narrative Review.Neurology international · 2025Review
- Real-World Experience with FcRn Inhibitors Efgartigimod and Rozanolixizumab in Myasthenia Gravis: Administration in Multiple Cycles and Transition from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Formulation.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- From promise to practice: evaluating the clinical impact of FcRn inhibition in IgG-mediated autoimmune rheumatic diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Case Report: Efgartigimod demonstrates significant clinical efficacy in double seropositive myasthenia gravis: a case report of a rare variant and analysis of pathomechanisms.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Efgartigimod non-responders after the first treatment cycle in generalized myasthenia gravis: a retrospective analysis of predictive factors.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Efgartigimod combined with rituximab helps improve the symptoms and reduce the use of corticosteroids in patients with MuSK antibody-positive MG: a single case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of patients positive for muscle-specific kinase antibody (hereafter, MuSK-Ab) accounts for 5-8% of all myasthenia gravis (MG) cases. Currently, efgartigimod has shown good therapeutic effects in MUSK-Ab-positive MG patients in a phase III clinical trial. However, phase III clinical trials tend to exclude MG patients in exacerbation, and there are only few real-world studies on the efficacy of efgartigimod in MuSK-Ab-positive myasthenic crisis (MC) patients. This retrospective, real-world study aimed to explore the efficacy of efgartigimod in MuSK-Ab-positive MG with exacerbation. Methods: We reviewed the clinical data of four MuSK-Ab-positive patients with exacerbation of MG who received efgartigimod at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, including two patients with MC. All patients were admitted between September 2023 and May 2024. Most patients are simultaneously undergoing rituximab treatment. Results: Each patient completed one cycle of efgartigimod. After the first administration, four patients showed a clinically meaningful decrease in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score (a reduction of more than 4 points compared to baseline), and all patients showed a decrease in IgG levels after one cycle of efgartigimod. Regarding safety, none of the patients experienced any obvious adverse effects. At the final follow-up, all patients achieved the minimal symptom expression status (an MG-ADL score of 0 or 1) following the first administration of efgartigimod for 8.75 ± 5.56 weeks. This article presents a case involving a patient who exhibited prompt alleviation of symptoms following the administration of a high dose of efgartigimod (20 mg/kg, given on days 1 and 5), without the use of any other fast-acting treatment. Conclusion: This retrospective real-world study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of efgartigimod in these four MuSK-Ab-positive, female Asian patients with exacerbation of MG, as well as in patients experiencing MC. It is important to note that efgartigimod should not be viewed as a substitute for foundational immunotherapy; rather, it is intended as a rescue treatment during exacerbations and as an adjunctive therapy in the context of long-term immunotherapy. This non-invasive approach has the potential to become another treatment option for MuSK-Ab-positive MG patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.