Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39628869›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Comparative analysis of racing performance following surgical correction of epiglottic entrapment in standardbreds and thoroughbreds.

Alannah M Norton, Sarah M Rosanowski, Tom O'Brien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alannah M NortonStutsel Veterinary Services, Bathurst, NSW, Australia.
Sarah M RosanowskiConsultant, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Tom O'BrienAvenel Equine Hospital, Avenel, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Epiglottic entrapment (EE) is a common cause of poor performance in racing standardbreds (STBs) and thoroughbreds (TBs). There is limited information published on the condition in STB racehorses and limited information on factors associated with return to racing available for either breed. Methods: This study investigated and compared the pre surgical findings, post-surgical complications and racing performance in STBs and TBs undergoing surgery for correction of EE. Associations between signalment and pre-surgical findings, and the presence of complications and racing post-surgery were compared using logistic regression analyses. Racing performance following surgery was compared to maternal siblings using conditional logistic regression. Results: There were 82 cases where epiglottic entrapment surgery was performed at least once: 33 STB cases and 49 TB cases. In total, 74% of cases raced following surgery. Cases with severe inflammation post-surgery ( Conclusion: Horses with post operative complications were at a lower odds of racing post surgery. In the current study, TBs with EE are more likely to race compared to their maternal half siblings however take longer to return to racing compared to STBs.

Indexed as

epiglottic entrapmentequineracehorsestandardbredthoroughbredupper respiratory tract surgery

Identifiers

PMID39628869
PMCPMC11611841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.