Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39628852›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2024

On efficiency of locally

Xiao Zhang, Gang Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiao ZhangDepartment of Statistics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4265-9457
Gang ShenDepartment of Statistics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the classical theory of locally optimal designs, which is developed within the framework of the center+error model, the most efficient design is the one based on MGLE, the maximum Gaussian likelihood estimator. However, practical scenarios often lack of complete information as to the governing probability model for the response measure and deviate from Gaussianity and homoscedasticity assumptions, in which, MqLE, the maximum quasi-likelihood estimator, has been advocated in the literature. In this work, we examine the locally optimal design based on the novel oracle-SLSE, the second-order least-square estimator, in the case where the underlying probability model is incompletely specified. We find that in a general setting, our oracle SLSE-based optimal design, incorporating skewness and kurtosis information, outperforms those based on MqLE or MGLE. Our numerical experiment supports this, with locally D-optimal designs based on MqLE approaching the efficiency of oracle-SLSE designs in some cases. This research guides the choice of estimators in practical scenarios departing from ideal assumptions.

Indexed as

efficiencyheteroscedasticnon-GaussianOptimal designsprecision

Identifiers

PMID39628852
PMCPMC11610314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.