Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39628817›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2024

Impact of androgen deprivation therapy in patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer receiving brachytherapy-based dose-escalated radiation therapy.

Nikhil T Sebastian, Subir Goyal, Yuan Liu, Vishal Dhere, Ashesh B Jani, Bruce Hershatter, Pretesh R Patel, Jay W Shelton, Sheela Hanasoge, Karen D Godette and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nikhil T SebastianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Subir GoyalBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Yuan LiuBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Vishal DhereDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ashesh B JaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bruce HershatterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Pretesh R PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jay W SheltonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sheela HanasogeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Karen D GodetteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sagar A PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: While the benefit of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been established for patients with intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) receiving dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), the role of ADT for patients treated with brachytherapy (BT) with or without supplemental EBRT (sEBRT) is less clear. Material and methods: We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) unfavorable IR (UIR) PCa. All patients received BT with or without sEBRT, and were stratified by the receipt of 4-6 months of ADT. Kaplan-Meier method was used to measure biochemical progression- free survival (bPFS) between men who did vs. did not receive ADT. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards with backward selection was utilized to determine association of concomitant ADT with bPFS accounting for confounding variables. Results: We identified 201 eligible patients treated between 2002 and 2019, 78 (38.8%) of whom received ADT. Median follow-up was 15 years. On univariable analysis, there was no significant association of ADT use with bPFS (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.34-2.63, Conclusions: Short-course ADT was not associated with improved bPFS in our study among men with UIR PCa treated with BT with or without sEBRT. These findings suggest that dose intensification achieved with BT may alone be sufficient in treating selected patients with UIR disease, but prospective studies are warranted.

Indexed as

androgen deprivation therapybrachytherapyprostate cancerunfavorable intermediate-risk

Identifiers

PMID39628817
PMCPMC11609856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.