ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 50 Years: A Descriptive Study With Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low Incidence of Osteoarthritis and Excellent Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 10 Years Following Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- No differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and complications after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstrings (HT) in patients aged 50 or older.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is increasingly being performed in patients >50 years old; however, the long-term outcomes are unclear. Purpose: To analyze the functional results, osteoarthritic progression, reoperation rate, and failure rate at minimum 10-year follow-up in patients >50 years old who have undergone primary ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Included in this study were patients >50 years old who underwent primary ACL reconstruction and had at least 10 years of follow-up data. All patients had instability with limitation of their activities, indicating the necessity of surgical intervention. Patients with revision surgeries, ACL repairs, and nonoperative treatment were excluded. Failure was defined as the presence of revision, high-grade Lachman, positive pivot shift (2+), or subjective instability. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), subjective and objective functional scores, and osteoarthritic progression were analyzed at final follow-up. Results: A total of 38 patients were identified. The mean age at surgery was 56.8 ± 5.7 years (range, 50.6-70 years). The mean clinical follow-up was 16.2 ± 4.3 years (range, 10.9-23.3 years). The failure rate was 10.5% (4/38): 1 of the 4 patients had a recurrence of instability at 13 years postoperatively and underwent revision with a modified Lemaire extra-articular tenodesis, 1 patient had a positive pivot shift (2+) without subjective instability, and 2 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty. The overall KOOS was 74.2 ± 22.2, and 91.4% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the results of the procedure. Radiographic osteoarthritis was identified in 88.5% of patients at final follow-up; however, there was no statistical significance on clinical outcomes ( Conclusion: In patients over the age of 50 years who underwent primary ACL reconstruction, there was a low long-term failure rate and a high level of patient satisfaction, despite osteoarthritic progression in 88.5% of cases. Concomitant meniscal procedures were associated with more severe osteoarthritic progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.