Trial reportClinical interventions in aging2024
Number of Retrieval Attempts and the Association of Intravenous Tirofiban with Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients with Successful Endovascular Therapy: Results of the RESCUE BT Trial.
Trial report in Clinical interventions in aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the relationship between intravenous tirofiban, the number of retrieval attempts and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in patients with successful EVT. Patients and Methods: We used the data from the Endovascular Treatment With versus Without Tirofiban for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke (RESCUE BT) Trial. The primary outcome was sICH, which was defined according to the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification. The association between the number of retrieval attempts and the rate of sICH was investigated using multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 866 patients were included in our analysis. In overall cohort, tirofiban (OR: 1.853, 95% CI: 1.039-3.307) and more than 2 passes (3 versus 0-1: OR: 2.482, 95% CI: 1.124-5.481; 2 versus 0-1: OR: 0.813, 95% CI: 0.389-1.696) were significantly associated with the occurrence of sICH. A significant interaction between the use of tirofiban and the increasing number of attempts was found (p for interaction = 0.02), whereby the presence of sICH was significantly associated with tirofiban (OR: 5.534, 95% CI: 1.586-19.315) in the subgroup of multiple passes (>2 passes group), while none was seen in the subgroup of 0-2 passes. The results of the sensitivity analysis also showed that more than 2 passes (3 versus 1: OR: 2.841, 95% CI: 1.102-7.323; 2 versus 1: OR: 0.852, 95% CI: 0.346-2.097) were significantly associated with the occurrence of sICH in the tirofiban group but not in the placebo group. Conclusion: In patients with multiple attempts, intravenous tirofiban may increase the risk of sICH. Further research and individualized risk assessment are necessary to determine the most appropriate strategy of intravenous tirofiban for EVT patients, especially considering details of thrombectomy procedures. Registration: : URL: http:// www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR-INR-17014167.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.