Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39628635›Full record

ArticleCanadian prosthetics & orthotics journal2024

Comparative Analysis of Three Types of Therapeutic Offloading Diabetic Shoes With Custom Made Insole on Plantar Pressure Distribution in Severe Diabetic Charcot Foot.

M Nouman, R Apiputhanayut, T Narungsri, S Tipchatyotin, T Dissaneewate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M NoumanSirindhorn School of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
R ApiputhanayutDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
T NarungsriProsthetics and Orthotics Unit, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
S TipchatyotinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
T DissaneewateDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2947-0375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCharcot foot deformity, a severe complication of diabetes, involves neuropathy and abnormal peak plantar pressure in the midfoot and forefoot. However, orthotic interventions and shoe modifications are used to address the sequelae of Charcot neuroarthropathy, offering different approaches to managing abnormal peak plantar pressure.

objectiveTo compare the effects of three types of therapeutic offloading diabetic shoes; prefabricated, relasting, and double rocker-modified shoes on peak plantar pressure in the midfoot and forefoot of nonulcerated chronic Charcot foot during walking. METHODOLOGY: A repeated measure design involved 15 participants (40% males and 60% females) with a mean age of 60.73 years (SD=10.50), with Charcot neuropathy. Participants were provided with three types of shoes; prefabricated, relasting, and double rocker-modified shoes, each equipped with the same custom-made insole (CMI). Plantar pressure was recorded while walking on level ground, focusing on the forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot. The study also investigated additional variables affecting plantar pressure distribution, including the pressure-time integral and contact area.

findingsThe type of shoe had distinct effects on the distribution of plantar pressure. The double rocker-modified shoe particularly impacted forefoot pressure during the terminal stance phase of the gait cycle. Peak plantar pressure at the forefoot increased by 5.37% with double rocker-modified shoes compared to relasting shoes. Both double rocker-modified and prefabricated shoes reduced midfoot peak plantar pressure by 8.73% and 11.97%, respectively. Similar trends were observed at the hindfoot, with reductions in peak plantar pressure. However, there were no significant differences in regional peak plantar pressure between the types of shoes except for the central forefoot (F (1.61, 22.5) = 5.69, p = 0.014).

conclusionThere were no significant differences in the effectiveness of prefabricated, relasting, and double rocker-modified shoes in reducing and redistributing peak plantar pressure in high-risk areas of chronic Charcot foot.

Indexed as

Charcot FootCustom Made InsoleDiabetic FootGaitNeuroarthropathyOrthosisOrthoticsPlantar PressureTherapeutic Shoe

Identifiers

PMID39628635
PMCPMC11609959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.