ArticleIntractable & rare diseases research2024
Updated information on neuro-prognosticative tools to predict outcomes for patients with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy induced by cardiac arrest.
Article in Intractable & rare diseases research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), caused by cardiac arrest (CA) is a refractory condition in clinical settings. The clinician and family members have to make a hard decision: continue expensive life-sustaining therapy or withdraw the expensive intervention. The core problem lies in "whether this patient can still be awakened and achieve neurological recovery". This study briefly summarizes the use of mainstream neuro-prognosticative tools thus far with the latest available evidence. To gain a better understanding of the pathophysiological state of patients with HIE, comprehensive use of these tools and repeated assessments are recommended. The final decision should be made cautiously and comprehensively in light of the patient's medical history, pathophysiological state, results of neuro-prognosticative evaluations, and the clinician's clinical experience
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.