Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39628471›Full record

ArticleInfection prevention in practice2024

Knowledge, attitudes and practices on prevention and control of high-consequence infectious diseases and critical care among intensive care personnel in Rwanda: a cross-sectional survey.

L Schneider, M Umutoni, V Ndagijimana, M Abdelrhman, T Cronen, M Nkeshimana, P Banguti, C Karamira, E Seruyange, T Piening and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

L SchneiderInstitute of International Health, Charité Center for Global Health, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
M UmutoniRwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
V NdagijimanaRwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
M AbdelrhmanInstitute of International Health, Charité Center for Global Health, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
T CronenDepartment of Infectious Disease, Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
M NkeshimanaDepartment of Accident and Emergency, University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda.
P BangutiDepartment of Accident and Emergency, King Faisal Hospital Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda.
C KaramiraCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Robert-Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
E SeruyangeCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
T PieningCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Robert-Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
A PhutiInstitute of International Health, Charité Center for Global Health, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
T PaerischCentre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Robert-Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
F MockenhauptInstitute of International Health, Charité Center for Global Health, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
C Mambo MuvunyiRwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
M GertlerInstitute of International Health, Charité Center for Global Health, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
E RwagasoreRwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Intensive care personnel in countries prone to outbreaks of high-consequence infectious diseases (HCIDs), such as Ebola virus disease, stand at the forefront of caring for affected patients. This study describes the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of intensive care personnel in Rwanda on the management and infection prevention and control (IPC) of HCIDs. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out among staff working in the 4 operational intensive care units in September 2022. The self-administered questionnaire collected information on participants' background and their KAP on critical care (CC), HCIDs and IPC. Results: Of the 107 participants, 67 (62.6%) had less than 4 years' work experience in CC. 41 (38.3%) of them had attended trainings on IPC since 2020. In univariate analyses, a higher knowledge score was associated with being a physician, years of working in CC and differed by hospital. A large proportion perceived their knowledge on CC as good or very good (58.0%) and their everyday risk of acquiring an infection as at least high (48.6%). Overall, 72.9% reported compliance with hand hygiene measures. However, around a quarter of participants reported rarely or never avoiding recapping of needles or never or rarely taking additional precautions during aerosol-generating procedures. Conclusions: Staff had a moderate knowledge base and might benefit from continuous learning on CC and HCIDs. The perception of high risk of infection at work stands in contrast with lack of compliance with basic IPC practices which should be reinforced to avoid preventable and potentially fatal infections.

Indexed as

EbolaHealthcare workersHigh-consequence infectious diseasesPreparednessRwanda

Identifiers

PMID39628471
PMCPMC11612771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.