Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39628409›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2024

Spinal Intramedullary Tumors.

Belal Neyazi, Aiden Haghikia, Christian Mawrin, Elke Hattingen, Dirk Vordermark, I Erol Sandalcioglu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Minimally invasive approaches to intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Belal NeyaziUniversity Clinic for Neurosurgery, Otto-von-Guericke Universität, Magdeburg; University Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke Universität, Magdeburg; Department of Neuropathology, Otto-von-Guericke Universität, Magdeburg; Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main; University Clinic for Radiation Therapy, Otto-von-Guericke Universität, Magdeburg; Department of Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale).
Aiden Haghikia
Christian Mawrin
Elke Hattingen
Dirk Vordermark
I Erol Sandalcioglu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntramedullary tumors are a subgroup of spinal tumors and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The estimated incidence of spinal tumors in general is 0.74 to 1.6 per 100 000 persons per year, with intramedullary tumors making up 10% to 30% of the total. The diagnosis is often delayed because of the insidious onset of symptoms, which are often nonspecific at first.

methodsThis review is based on pertinent publications about intramedullary tumors that were retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed database.

resultsIntramedullary tumors often cause diffuse neurologic symptoms of gradually increasing severity, progressing, in advanced cases, to a complete spinal cord transection syndrome. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine without and with intravenous contrast is the standard diagnostic technique. The histopathological origin of most intramedullary tumors is from glial cells, but other types of intramedullary tumor exist as well. The primary treatment of all intramedullary tumors is surgical resection. 9% to 34% of patients may experience a worse neurological deficit after surgery than before, but such problems resolve completely in 25% to 41% of cases. The extent of resection is the main factor affecting the risk of tumor recurrence and progression. The extent of resection also determines the possible indication for adjuvant treatment, which is needed, in particular, for high-grade and subtotally resected tumors, and for those that display progression. The treatment of intramedullary tumors is based on case series, retrospective analyses, and case reports, as randomized trials are lacking.

conclusionPatients with intramedullary tumors should be cared for, as much as possible, in the setting of prospective, uniform studies of their spontaneous course and the outcomes after treatment. This will yield better evidence on the treatment of these tumors in the future.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID39628409
PMCPMC12094706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.