ArticleHistopathology2025
Recurrent primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma: a comparative study of initial tumours, recurrences, and outcomes in 61 patients.
Article in Histopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas: a narrative review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment strategies.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Mycosis Fungoides, Sézary Syndrome, and Cutaneous B-Cell Lymphomas: 2025 Update on Diagnosis, Risk-Stratification, and Management.American journal of hematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsPrimary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (PCMZL) is considered a lymphoproliferative disorder (International Consensus Classification, ICC) or an overt lymphoma (WHO-HAEM5). Seeking evidence for a reactive process or true lymphoma, we retrieved recurrent PCMZLs from the French Study Group of Cutaneous Lymphoma (GFELC) database.
methodsHistology, phenotype (light-chain restriction, immunoglobulin, and immune-receptor translocation-associated protein-1 [IRTA1] expression) and B-cell clonality at diagnosis and recurrence were compared according to recurrence site (local, locoregional, or distant) and outcomes.
resultsInitial lesions of the 61 patients (mean age 52) were mostly isolated on the trunk (48%) and classified T1 (70%). Times to first recurrence for local, locoregional, and distant recurrences, were 20, 29, and 37 months, respectively. Light-chain restriction type did not differ significantly between local/locoregional recurrences and distal recurrences (P = 0.06; n = 60). The same B-cell clones were identified for 23/42 local/locoregional recurrences, while 5/19 distant recurrences showed different clonal profiles (P = 0.0003). No tumour expressed IRTA1. Fifty-eight tumours were heavy-chain (IgG/IgG4) class-switched PCMZLs and 3 IgM+/IgD- PCMZLs. All IgM+ tumours underwent either transformation (skin or brain) into diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) and extracutaneous spreading.
conclusionAs suggested by WHO-HAEM5, immunoglobulin phenotype assessment (IgM alongside IgD) appears to be a possible valuable tool in the initial diagnosis of PCMZL to differentiate between the indolent class-switched PCMZL (IgM-negative) and IgM+ (IgD-) PCMZL, which has an uncertain prognosis. The variation in B-cell rearrangements and light chain restriction observed in distant recurrences of PCMZL may suggest different antigen-driven stimulation processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.