ArticleAmerican journal of men's health
The Role of Freehand Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia Without Antibiotics in Outpatient Settings.
Article in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to evaluate and compare the application of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy (FTPB) under local anesthesia (LA) versus systematic transperineal prostate biopsy (STPB) in an outpatient setting without antibiotics. A total of 218 biopsy-naive patients with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) were retrospectively analyzed. Suspicious areas on mpMRI were graded using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1). FTPB was performed for each suspicious lesion, followed by a 12-core STPB under LA. Histopathological outcomes, complications, and tolerability were recorded. The results showed that PCa was detected in 129 (59.17%) patients, with 104 (47.71%) being clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). There was agreement between FTPB and STPB in 94 (72.88%) patients. FTPB diagnosed fewer PCa cases but more csPCa cases than STPB. LA-FTPB was well-tolerated with no severe complications. The conclusions suggest that FTPB under LA in an outpatient setting without antibiotics is safe, feasible, and efficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.