SynthesisEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2025
Review article: Evaluating the effectiveness of arterial pressure point techniques as a first aid method for external haemorrhage control: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current ANZCOR guidelines for first aid management of life-threatening bleeding from a limb, where bleeding cannot be controlled with direct pressure, recommends the use of an arterial tourniquet. However, tourniquets required specialised training and equipment, which may not be accessible in all emergencies. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of arterial pressure point techniques (APPT) as a first aid measure for controlling life-threatening, non-compressible bleeding from limbs and anatomical junctions. A comprehensive literature search was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The search was used in five databases: PubMed, CINAHL, SportDiscuss, Proquest Central and Embase. Eligible studies included adult participants in and out of hospital settings, focusing on extremities and junctional areas. Studies assessing APPT alone or compared with other first aid techniques were included. The review included nine quasi-experimental articles, with eight having low levels of evidence. Although most reported high success rates (87.5-100%) for APPT achieving blood flow cessation, its effectiveness compared to alternative methods, such as arterial tourniquets, remains inconclusive because of methodological heterogeneity and differing success benchmarks. APPT shows promise in external haemorrhage control. Additional research with higher levels of evidence, standardised protocols and larger sample sizes is needed. Investigation in real-world scenarios is crucial to compare methods like tourniquets. Future research will determine APPT's effectiveness and its potential role as a bridging technique before tourniquet application or medical assistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.