Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39628093›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2025

Utilizing an Opportunistic Clinical Study and Population-Based Pharmacokinetic Models to Identify Rational Empiric Dosing Regimens for Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients.

Joshua A Reeder, C Buddy Creech, Roger L Nation, Kenan Gu, Demet Nalbant, Nan Wu, Natalia Jimenez-Truque, William Fissell, Stephanie L Rolsma, Nicholas Fishbane and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inclusion of Women, Children, the Elderly, and Individuals With Underlying Medical Conditions: Prioritizing Vulnerable Populations in Clinical Research.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Joshua A ReederDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
C Buddy CreechDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Roger L NationMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Kenan GuDivision of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Demet NalbantDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Nan WuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1475-4503
Natalia Jimenez-TruqueDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
William FissellDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Stephanie L RolsmaDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-2222
Nicholas FishbaneThe Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4316-1341
Carl M J KirkpatrickMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Pratish C PatelDepartment of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Amy WatanabeThe Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, MD, USA.
Cornelia B LandersdorferMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Patricia WinokurDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Guohua AnDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6498-7663

Funding

University of Iowa Institute for Clinical and Translational ScienceUM1TR004403 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Marlan R Hansen, Patricia Winokur · 2023 to 2026
$16.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004403NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200800008C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining an effective dosing regimen for piperacillin-tazobactam in critically ill patients is challenging due to substantial pharmacokinetic variability caused by complex pathophysiological changes. To address this need, a prospective clinical study was conducted, which enrolled 112 critically ill patients and employed an opportunistic sampling strategy. Population modeling and simulation were performed to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and probability of target attainment (PTA) of piperacillin-tazobactam under various dosing regimens. Both piperacillin and tazobactam final models were one-compartment models with zero-order input and first-order elimination. Significant covariates included lean body weight for piperacillin and creatinine clearance along with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for both drugs. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that continuous infusion can achieve higher PTA than intermittent and extended infusions. When considering the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 16 mg/L for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (a frequently encountered bacterial pathogen among critically ill patients) and a PK/PD target of 100% fT >MIC, continuous infusion of 6 g/day is recommended for critically ill patients with a CLcr <60 mL/min, 9 g/day for patients with CLcr in the range of 60 to 129 mL/min, and 12 g/day for patients with a CLcr ≥130 mL/min. In addition, extended infusion represents a good alternative, especially the 3 g q6h or 4 g q6h regimens which can achieve the designated European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) non-species-related PK/PD breakpoint of 8 mg/L. Our study provided valuable insight into PTA outcomes, which, together with individual renal function of future patients and institution-specific piperacillin susceptibility patterns, may assist physicians when making dosing decisions.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsModels, BiologicalPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCritical IllnessFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodPiperacillinProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combinationempiric antibiotic dosing regimen selectionopportunistic clinical studypharmacometric modelingpiperacillin–tazobactampopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID39628093
PMCPMC11938006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.