Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627880›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychology2024

Training emotional competencies at the workplace: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Miriam Mehler, Elisabeth Balint, Maria Gralla, Tim Pößnecker, Michael Gast, Michael Hölzer, Markus Kösters, Harald Gündel

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miriam MehlerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany. miriam.mehler@uni-ulm.de.
Elisabeth BalintCenter for Burnout and Stress-Related Disorders, Privatklinik Meiringen, Meiringen, Switzerland.
Maria GrallaDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Tim PößneckerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Michael GastDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Michael HölzerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Markus Kösters *Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Harald Gündel *Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent systematic reviews have shown that emotional competencies can be improved through training. In the workplace, such training has become increasingly popular over the last decade. These programs aim to enhance emotional intelligence, empathy or emotion regulation. This study wants to assess the training effects and potential moderators of these workplace interventions. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that focuses on the workplace context and integrates emotional intelligence, empathy, and emotion regulation training interventions. This study has been preregistered with PROSPERO and a protocol has been published before the review was conducted (CRD42021267073). We conducted a systematic literature search using Embase, PsycInfo, PSYNDEX, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The included studies were analyzed in two metaanalyses. In the primary analysis, we analyzed standardized mean changes in emotional competencies before and after the training for 50 included studies, depending on (a) training construct and (b) participants' profession (teachers, health professionals, managers, and others). To determine the efficacy of the trainings, we conducted a separate metaanalysis of controlled trials only (k = 27). Both metaanalyses yielded moderate overall effect sizes that also persisted more than three months after the training end: (1) SMD

Indexed as

Emotional IntelligenceEmotional RegulationEmpathyWorkplaceHumansEmotional intelligenceEmotion regulationEmpathyLeadershipMeta-analysisTraining and developmentWorkplace intervention

Identifiers

PMID39627880
PMCPMC11616120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.