ArticleBMC health services research2024
Exploring disparities in post-cancer treatment instructions: an analysis of rural vs. urban breast cancer survivors in Missouri using BRFSS data.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are more than 4 million breast cancer survivors in the United States. With continuing improvements in early detection and treatment, the number of breast cancer survivors will only continue to increase. Breast cancer survivors face a lifetime risk of long-term or late-effects from cancer treatments, thus post-cancer treatment care, referred to as survivorship care, is critical. Social determinants of health, including where a breast cancer survivor lives, may impact cancer survivorship care. Our purpose was to evaluate the relationship between rural/urban status and receipt of cancer survivorship care and instructions for Missouri breast cancer survivors using state-level data from a nationwide telephone survey-the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).
methodsMissouri included the BRFSS Cancer Survivorship Module in 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020. Module items ask cancer survivors about receipt of a "post-cancer-treatment summary" and "follow-up instructions." We hypothesized chances of receipt of both components would differ among four level Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) Code groups (Rural, Small-Town, Micropolitan, Metropolitan). Data from 430 breast cancer survivors over four survey years were combined and grouped according to RUCA status. Using a logistic model with a multilevel approach (after sampling weights calibration), the relationship between receipt of survivorship instructions and RUCA group was examined.
results46% of Missouri breast cancer survivors reported receipt of complete survivorship instructions. Compared to rural breast cancer survivors, micropolitan breast cancer survivors had 5.9 times higher odds of receiving survivorship instructions (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsLess than half of respondents reported receiving complete post-cancer treatment instructions. More urban respondents were more likely to receive instructions than their rural counterparts which raises questions about the quality of post-treatment care between rural and urban survivors. A sophisticated and purposeful approach to mitigating potential disparities is warranted. Receipt of cancer survivorship care plans may be impacted by rurality/urbanicity. Clinicians caring for cancer survivors living in rural or urban settings must continue to be diligent with providing personalized survivorship care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.