Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627851›Full record

Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2024

Impact of the digital health application ViViRA on spinal mobility, physical function, quality of life and pain perception in spondyloarthritides patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Paloma Palm von Alten Blaskowitz, Anna-Maria Liphardt, Claudia Bouzas, Birte Coppers, Pascal Petit, Nicolas Vuillerme, Vanessa Bundle, Sebastian Rudolf, Johannes Knitza, Maria Gabriella Raimondo and 9 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Paloma Palm von Alten BlaskowitzDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Anna-Maria LiphardtDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Claudia BouzasDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Birte CoppersDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Pascal PetitUniv. Grenoble Alpes, AGEIS, Grenoble, France.
Nicolas VuillermeUniv. Grenoble Alpes, AGEIS, Grenoble, France.
Vanessa BundleDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Sebastian RudolfDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Johannes KnitzaInstitute for Digital Medicine, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Maria Gabriella RaimondoDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Hannah LabinskyDepartment of Internal Medicine 2, Rheumatology/Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Lukas HatscherDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Andreas WirschingDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Daniela BohrDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Elizabeth AraujoDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Andreas RammingDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Alina RammingDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Georg SchettDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Harriet MorfDepartment of Medicine 3 - Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg and Uniklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. harriet.morf@uk-erlangen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpondyloarthritides (SpAs) are a group of common rheumatic diseases that often cause limited mobility and lower back pain. Physiotherapy is an integral part of treatment, but access to physiotherapy limits treatment success. Digital health applications (DHAs) enable home-based physiotherapy and could significantly improve access for SpAs patients. The aim is to investigate the clinical effects of the DHA ViViRA compared with those of standard physiotherapy.

methodsSpAs patients with chronic back pain were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. The intervention group received ViViRA DHA, whereas the control group received standard physiotherapy. Pain (verbal rating scale, PAIN-Detect), quality of life (SF-36) and mobility (BASMI) were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks as the primary outcomes.

resultsData from 59 participants (71.2% female, mean age 45.2 years) were analyzed. The intervention group showed a significant improvement in mobility (average BASMI score: baseline: 1.1 [range 0.7-1.5]; follow-up: 1.0 [range 0.5-1.4]; p = 0.05), whereas the control group showed a significant decrease in mobility (baseline: 1.5 [range 1.1-1.9]; follow-up: 1.8 [range 1.4-2.2]; p = 0.00). The intervention group demonstrated lower pain intensity (VRS pain level at week 3.5 ± 2.8) than did the control group (VRS pain level at week 4.5 ± 2) after 12 weeks.

conclusionOur results highlight the efficacy of DHAs such as ViViRA in the treatment of lower back pain in SpAs patients. Compared with the current gold standard, physiotherapy, DHA use results in superior outcomes. However, further larger studies are needed to confirm these promising results.

trial registrationThe study is registered in the German clinical trial registry (DRKS) under the following ID: DRKS00031254.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesQuality of LifeAdultDigital HealthFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPain PerceptionTelemedicineTreatment OutcomeDHADigital health applicationE-HealthMobilityPhysical functionPsoriatic spondylitisSpondyloarthritidesSpondyloarthropathyViViRA

Identifiers

PMID39627851
PMCPMC11613898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.