ArticleBMC nutrition2024
Uptake of preventive nutrition interventions among caretakers of children under 5 years in a pastoral setting of South Sudan.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acceptability, feasibility and equity implications of nutritional supplementation interventions for the prevention of wasting in infants and young children: A rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreventive nutrition interventions (PNI) are usually implemented without understanding how multilevel factors affect uptake. Undernutrition is defined as inadequate intake of nutritious foods. Pastoral populations in conflict settings are seen to have low uptake. The study assessed the level and multiple factors influencing the uptake of PNI in caregivers of under 5 in Kapoeta South County of South Sudan.
methodsA quantitative approach was employed with an element of a qualitative in a socio-ecological framework. A total of 405 caretakers of CU5 were selected to respond to quantitative household interviews, while qualitative data was collected using KIIs. Primary data were collected through structured questionnaires, which were used to attain quantitative data. The data collected through the method of KII were of qualitative type. Using deductive thematic analysis approach, the quantitative data were coded into personal, interpersonal, and community-level factors, and the analysis was done using STATA software version 16. A technique for constructing the uptake level as low, medium, or high was factor analysis. With the result of the binary logistic regression to determine association. Furthermore, semi-structured KIIs were conducted and the qualitative information analyzed thematically to elaborate on the quantitative results.
resultThe uptake level of the Preventive Nutrition Interventions (PNIs) was low at 51. 4%. In the socioecological system, facilitators and barriers related to this uptake differed across the benchmarks of that model. At the community level however, lack of a health facility within the community (OR = 1. 63, C. I. = 1. 02-2. 59) and the time taken before one can access a health facility (OR = 1. 70, C. I = 1. 30-2. 23) showed that accessibility could encourage uptake of PNIs. In the interpersonal dimension, joint decision makers at the family level (OR = 0. 31, C. I = 0. 19-0. 50) had higher uptake. Three factors at the individual level revealed that low uptake was inversely related to caregivers' knowledge of PNIs (OR = 0. 16, C. I. = 0. 10-0. 25), but positively related to having an undernourished child (OR = 2. 59, C. I. = 1. 73-3. 89), as well as number of children in the household (OR = 0. 40, C. I. = 0. 26). KIIs validate that undernutrition and practical issues were the main determinant of PNI uptake.
conclusionThis study found that caretakers of children under 5 years reported low knowledge of and uptake to preventive nutrition interventions (PNIs) among the pastoral population in South Sudan. Based on the proposed socioecological model, we recommend that PNI approaches need to target multiple levels. At the community level, the focus is on improving access to health facilities and reducing the travel time to these facilities. Another way to increase intervention uptake is to improve spousal-supported joint decisions at the interpersonal level. Enhancing the awareness of the target audience and providing them with relevant information can impact the utilization rates of PNIs at the individual level. Therefore, nutrition stakeholders should employ an approach that targets community, interpersonal, and individual levels with the purpose of increasing PNI uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.