ArticleBMC health services research2024
A mixed methods study of the postnatal care journey from birth to discharge in a maternity service in New South Wales, Australia.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundService gaps continue in hospital and community-based postnatal care despite a high prevalence of physical and mental health concerns reported by women following birth. The aim of this study was to describe the postnatal journey and the care provided to women and their babies who were at low risk for health complications from birth to discharge from the maternity service.
methodsA mixed methods design was used to map the postnatal journey, for the woman and baby, from birth to discharge from the maternity service. Data were collected through activity diaries completed by 15 women and telephone interviews with the women two weeks after birth.
resultsThe average hospital postnatal stay was 70 h and, in this time, the women received on average, a total of 3 h of direct care from a health professional. That is, 4.3% of the in-hospital postnatal stay was spent interacting with a health professional. Approximately 53 min of care in the postnatal unit was directed at the mother's health, 50 min on the baby's health needs, 43 min supporting breastfeeding and 20 min on discharge information. Most reported that hospital based postnatal care was helpful, although they reported that staff on the postnatal unit were rushed and mostly the midwife caring for them was unfamiliar to them. Breastfeeding support in the first 12-24 h was limited, with women wanting more one-on-one access to midwives. Some women received home-based midwifery care, and on average each home visit by a midwife was 29 min. Women who received home-based midwifery care reported that this care was very helpful. Women reported that home-based midwives were more likely to engage women in conversations about their social and emotional needs than hospital-based midwives. All mothers were offered a home visit from a child and family health nurse and most visited a general practitioner in the first week.
conclusionsWomen often experience limited time in direct interaction with midwives in the postnatal unit in hospital. Those who received midwifery care at home were more satisfied with this care, Women are requesting more support from professionals in the early postnatal period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.