Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627777›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2024

Controversies in implementing the exemption policy for the elderly healthcare services in Tanzania: experiences from the priority setting process in two selected districts.

Malale Tungu, Nathanael Sirili, Alphoncina Kagaigai, Pankras Luoga, Novatus Tesha, Thadeus Ruwaichi, Gasto Frumence

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Malale TunguDepartment of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. malaletungu@gmail.com.
Nathanael SiriliDepartment of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Alphoncina KagaigaiDepartment of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Pankras LuogaDepartment of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Novatus TeshaDepartment of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Thadeus RuwaichiDepartment of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Gasto FrumenceDepartment of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete Scholarship for PhD studies
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth financing system in Tanzania changed in the early 1990s as a result of the introduction of cost-sharing policies by the 1990s health sector reforms. The reforms brought about user fees which has led to inequity in access to health care services and catastrophic health expenditure among the elderly. In efforts to reduce the inequity gap among vulnerable groups, in 1994, the government introduced an exemption and waiver policy. More than three decades later, inequity in health care services access has persisted with the elderly population being more affected. The latter poses questions on the implementation efficiency of the exemption policy. We aimed to assess the implementation of the exemption policy on access to health services among the elderly in Tanzania by learning from the experiences of the priority setting process in two districts of western Tanzania.

methodsAn exploratory qualitative case study adopting Key informant interviews (KIIs) was used to collect data in Nzega and Igunga districts. The key informants involved the representatives of the planning team and decision makers from the community, health facility and district level. Information saturation was attained after the 24th interview and thus data collection ended. The content analysis approach was used to analyse the data.

findingsAlthough there is a designated office that deals with exemptions for the elderly in health facilities, there are challenges in accessing health services. The challenges include insufficient drugs, some laboratory tests not covered by the exemption, a lengthy process to access service, poor financial mechanisms for exempted services, inadequate information and clarity of the exemption categories, and limited to no involvement of different stakeholders in the exemption process.

conclusionThe exemption policy was introduced to help disadvantaged groups, including the elderly. However, its implementation encountered challenges which burden both the elderly and the health facilities. Its implementation has thus become a controversy to its initial aim that was to relieve the elderly from high healthcare costs. Revisiting the policy through a thorough stakeholders' engagement and establishing alternative financing of the exemption policy are recommended.

Indexed as

ElderlyExemption policyPriority setting and health care financing

Identifiers

PMID39627777
PMCPMC11613900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.