Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627766›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Evaluation of response to a cholera outbreak in January 2024 using the 7-1-7 timeliness metrics: a case study of Elegu Point of Entry, Uganda.

Innocent Ssemanda, Brian Kibwika, Ritah Namusoosa, Benon Kwesiga, Lilian Bulage, Richard Migisha, Alex Riolexus Ario

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Innocent SsemandaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda. issemanda@uniph.go.ug.
Brian KibwikaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Ritah NamusoosaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Benon KwesigaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Lilian BulageUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Richard MigishaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Alex Riolexus ArioUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholera is a major public health threat in Uganda, especially in border districts prone to outbreaks from cross-border movement. We investigated and evaluated the initial response to a January 2024 cholera outbreak in Elegu Town, on the Uganda-South Sudan border, using the 7-1-7 timeliness metrics to assess detection, notification, and response capacities, highlighting Uganda's preparedness and challenges in managing cross-border outbreaks.

methodsWe defined a suspected case as the onset of acute watery diarrhea in an asylum seeker at the Elegu border point from January to February 2024. A confirmed case was a suspected case in which Vibrio cholerae was isolated in the stool by culture or PCR. We actively searched for cases and collected data on person characteristics, symptoms, and outbreak timeliness. We used semi-structured interviews to elicit insights from district health officials on the enabling factors and bottlenecks during the response. We used the 7-1-7 metric to assess detection, notification, and response capacities of the point of entry.

resultsThirteen members of a refugee family from South Sudan were diagnosed with cholera within 6 h of arrival at the Elegu border, with 4 (31%) confirmed cases. No death occurred. The authorities detected, notified, and responded to the outbreak within the 7-1-7 timelines, with no major bottlenecks identified. The outbreak was detected and notified within one day and by the fifth day, a full response was mounted. The prompt response was attributed to the availability of a functional emergency operations center and the presence of trained surveillance frontline health workers.

conclusionResponse to an imported cholera outbreak at Elegu border point demonstrated Uganda's preparedness in managing cross-border disease outbreaks. Achieving the 7-1-7 targets highlighted the country's-built capacity to detect, notify, and respond to such events. Continued investment in local-level disease detection, communication, and national-level resource mobilization will be crucial to sustaining future effective cross-border outbreak prevention and control strategies.

Indexed as

CholeraDisease OutbreaksRefugeesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSouth SudanTime FactorsUgandaYoung Adult7–1–7 metricsCholeraCross-border outbreak prevention and controlDetectionImported outbreakNotificationResponseUganda

Identifiers

PMID39627766
PMCPMC11616103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.