ArticleBMC cancer2024
Circulating Tumor cells and multiple indicators combined to identify the risk of poorer prognosis in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SXRNSCLC-PRSP software to predict prognostic risk and survival in patients with resected TJournal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Characteristics of Oligo-Recurrence and Treatment Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurgical resection is an important treatment option for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, recurrence and survival rates remain a cause of concern. To further improve prognosis, more studies have focused on liquid biopsy, which has significant value as a prognostic factor for defining the risk stratification of postoperative NSCLC patients. This study aimed to identify circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as biomarkers that indicate a poor prognosis, combined with multiple indicators to determine prognostic risks in advance and develop individualized treatment strategies.
methodsBetween November 2015 and August 2018, 65 radical resected patients with NSCLC were analyzed. Preoperative CTCs were collected, and follow-up lasted until August 2023. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were the primary outcomes.
resultsWith an 11 CTC unit threshold, the high preoperative CTC level group had worse OS and DFS than the low-level group, suggesting that preoperative CTC levels have prognostic value. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves also showed satisfactory predictive efficiency of CTCs. Univariate analysis revealed that preoperative CTC levels were significantly associated with increasing risks for OS and DFS. Moreover, we combined CTCs and multiple indicators to provide a reference for a group at high risk of adverse outcomes.
conclusionsCTCs serve as feasible biomarkers for predicting postoperative prognosis in NSCLC patients. The combination of hematological, radiological, and pathological features could be valuable tools to guide postoperative management and treatment decisions in these patients. A multimodal prognostic approach is important for the clinical evaluation of lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.