Trial reportBMC medical education2024
Qatar dental student perceptions of Sirona prep-check software for learning crown preparations.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContemporary dental education requires swift assimilation of technological advancements to prepare the future generation of dentists. Integrating digital tools, such as prepCheck software in crown preparations offers a promising avenue for enhancing the learning experiences of dental students. This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions and experiences of undergraduate dental students regarding the use of PrepCheck software for learning crown preparations.
methodsAn interventional study design was employed to investigate the perceptions of undergraduate dental students regarding the use of Sirona prepCheck software their learning experiences in the prosthodontics course at the College of Dental Medicine. were recruited using purposive sampling. Participants received training on crown preparations using standard didactic and practical teaching methods. A total of 64 dental students (Mean age 22.4 years) participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to two groups, 32 participants each. The study group utilized prepCheck software and the control group relied solely on supervisor feedback. Both groups completed their crown preparation labs concurrently, ensuring consistency in training and assessment conditions.
resultsOut of a total number of 66 students enrolled on the course, 64 participated in the study giving a response rate of 96.96%. The overall mean score for all items was 1.01 (95%CI 0.77-1.25), indicating positive perceptions of the participants about prepCheck software. Analysis of variance revealed no significant variation by gender. Thematic analysis of open-ended items identified key themes related to the advantages and challenges of using prepCheck. Advantages included immediate self-evaluation, objective analysis, and feedback, while challenges included operational difficulties and cost concerns.
conclusionThis study provides insights into the effectiveness of prepCheck in dental education, offering perspectives derived from both quantitative and qualitative analyses. A majority of the participants recommended that digital assessment should be integrated with conventional methods, underscoring the importance of human input through supervisor feedback. The study demonstrates the potential of prepCheck software in enhancing participants' learning experiences in crown preparation assessment. While digital tools offer advantages such as self-evaluation and objective analysis, they need to be supported with input and feedback from the supervisors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.