Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627731›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

A digital and nurse-led support intervention, first year after prostate cancer treatment: a single-arm feasibility study in a Swedish primary care setting.

Nazmije Kelmendi, Ann Langius-Eklöf, Marina Taloyan, Kay Sundberg, Åsa Craftman, Marie Nilsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nazmije KelmendiDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, Stockholm, 141 52, Sweden. nazmije.kelmendi@ki.se.
Ann Langius-EklöfDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, Stockholm, 141 52, Sweden.
Marina TaloyanAcademic Primary Health Care Center, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, 113 65, Sweden.
Kay SundbergDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, Stockholm, 141 52, Sweden.
Åsa CraftmanDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, Stockholm, 141 52, Sweden.
Marie NilssonAcademic Primary Health Care Center, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, 113 65, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of patients with prostate cancer is increasing, and the first year after treatment is a vulnerable period for patients as they experience symptoms and unmet needs. Although electronic patient-reported outcomes that focus on patient self-management have demonstrated benefits, evidence is sparse regarding patients with prostate cancer in primary care settings and the role of nurses as a supportive resource. The significant role of primary care in future cancer care is on the agenda. This study aims to test the feasibility of a complex intervention that includes electronic patient-reported outcomes and self-management advice in an app, combined with nurse-led support, in primary care settings during the first year after curative intended prostate cancer treatment.

methodsThe intervention lasted four weeks and was a single-arm study. Feasibility was assessed by examining the recruitment process, retention rate, adherence to the reporting of symptoms in the app, and acceptability of the intervention. Data was collected through (1) logged data from the app that included patient-reported outcomes and self-management advice, (2) field notes by the nurse, and (3) semi-structured interviews with patients. Descriptive statistics were applied to logged data. The interviews and the field notes were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsThe recruitment rate was 55%, yielding 11 patients with high retention as all completed the intervention. Adherence to reporting was 100%, and all functions in the app were used. Individual variation in how patients used the app was found, which was attributed to patients' current needs. In total, 36 health dialogues with the nurse (virtual, face-to-face, telephone) were performed; all first dialogues lasted longer, while follow-ups were shorter. Patients described that the health dialogues covered relevant subjects and that the combination of using the app and health dialogues was tailored and provided supplementary support. No adverse events occurred; however, a few technical difficulties interfered with the intervention, and the patients gave valuable suggestions for improvement. Furthermore, patients suggested that the intervention should start immediately after treatment.

conclusionAs the patients adhered to and accepted the intervention, it was considered feasible. Findings suggest intervention should start directly after treatment ends.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesMobile ApplicationsPrimary Health CareProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSelf CareSelf-ManagementSwedenDigital healtheHealthFeasibilityFollow-upInterventionNursePrimary careProstate cancerSelf-managementSupport

Identifiers

PMID39627731
PMCPMC11613876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.