Trial reportBMC oral health2024
Clinical evaluation of SonicFill bulk resin technique in the restoration of proximal deep caries of primary molars: a two-year randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeTraditional restorative composites require time-consuming incremental layering techniques which poses challenges in pediatric dentistry. SonicFill bulk resin allows for thicker layers to be placed efficiently, reducing treatment time and enhancing filling quality. This prospective, parallel, randomized, controlled clinical study aimed to compare the operative time and outcomes between SonicFill bulk resin and conventional restorative composite for deep proximal restorations in primary molars. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 129 primary molars in patients with proximal deep caries were randomly assigned to two groups. The experimental group (n = 66) received SonicFill bulk resin treatment, while the control group (n = 63) underwent restoration using traditional composite. The operative time was documented, and all teeth were evaluated at 6, 12, 18, and 24 -months post-treatment based on the modified criteria from the United States Public Health Service and radiographic examination score.
resultsThe operative time for SonicFill resin (137.5 ± 5.2 s) revealed a significant reduction compared to traditional composite (193.5 ± 14.4 s), (t = 29.64, P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of colour match, marginal adaptation and so on. Success rates were 95.2% for the control group and 89.4% for the experimental group (χ
conclusionThe SonicFill resin technique has proven to be a viable and time-efficient option for the restoration of primary molars with deep proximal caries.
trial registrationThis study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200055570) on the date of 13/01/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.