Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627630›Full record

Trial reportEuropean geriatric medicine2025

Effects of a daylight intervention in the morning on circadian rhythms and sleep in geriatric patients: a randomized crossover trial.

Anna Schubert, Thea Laurentius, Svenja Lange, Jens Bertram, Leo Cornelius Bollheimer, Marcel Schweiker, Rania Christoforou

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European geriatric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna SchubertHealthy Living Spaces Lab, Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. anna.schubert@rwth-aachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2615-6492
Thea LaurentiusDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Svenja LangeHealthy Living Spaces Lab, Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Jens BertramInstitute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Leo Cornelius BollheimerDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Marcel SchweikerHealthy Living Spaces Lab, Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Rania ChristoforouHealthy Living Spaces Lab, Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

Villum Fonden 21055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDuring hospitalization, circadian rhythms and sleep are often disrupted, which has negative effects on health outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether a daylight intervention in the morning could improve the circadian rhythms of cortisol and melatonin and enhance objective and subjective sleep quality in geriatric patients.

methodsThe present study is a randomized, two-period crossover trial conducted in a geriatric ward in 15 non-demented geriatric trauma patients with a mean age of 83.1 ± 5.4 years. All patients underwent a daylight intervention period, during which they were exposed to a daylight lamp from 8:00 to 13:00 h, and a control period of 6 days each. Cortisol and melatonin levels were measured on day 5 of each period. Objective and subjective sleep quality were assessed using actigraphy and questionnaires, respectively. Within-participant differences between periods were investigated for all parameters.

resultsA trend towards improvement in cortisol and melatonin rhythmicity was found. An increase in mean melatonin levels from 0.3 ± 0.1 to 0.9 ± 0.8 ng/L was observed during the intervention period (p = .063). There was also a trend towards increased sleep efficiency, whereas subjective sleep quality tended to decrease. None of the results were significant.

conclusionA daylight intervention in the morning led to a positive trend in cortisol and melatonin rhythmicity, whereas no improvement in subjective sleep quality was found.

trial registrationDRKS00028626 at German Clinical Trials Register, 13.06.2022.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmHydrocortisoneMelatoninSleepSleep QualityActigraphyAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Over StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesHydrocortisoneMelatoninActigraphyCircadian rhythmCortisolMelatoninSleepSubjective sleep quality

Identifiers

PMID39627630
PMCPMC11850413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.