Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627621›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2025

Digital technology in physical examination teaching: clinical educators' perspectives and current practices.

Jessica Lees, Torsten Risǿr, Linda Sweet, Margaret Bearman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica LeesFaculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia. leesje@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0026-9432
Torsten RisǿrFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2018-528X
Linda SweetFaculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0605-1186
Margaret BearmanCentre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning (CRADLE), Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6862-9871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of digital technologies in clinical learning environments is increasing. However, there is little research into how technologies influence the interplay between touch and the acquisition of physical examination skills by health professional students. In this study, we aimed to explore how digital technologies feature in clinical educators' accounts of current physical examination teaching in practice. A qualitative interpretive design was used. Data was collected via in-depth interviews with 18 clinical educators from the disciplines of medicine, physiotherapy, midwifery, and nursing to investigate the current perspectives and practices used in teaching physical examination. We interpreted three themes within the data: Polarised perspectives of digital technology use in physical examination teaching, the integration of digital technologies into the teaching of physical examination, and the invisibility of digital technologies in physical examination teaching. Digital technologies have been extensively integrated into the teaching of physical examination. However, the perceptions of the participating clinical educators have not evolved at the same pace. We suggest that clinical educators re-examine their assumptions and attune themselves to the dynamic relationship between hands-on skills and digital tools.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyPhysical ExaminationClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchTeachingClinical educationDigital technologyPhysical examinationTeachingTouch

Identifiers

PMID39627621
PMCPMC12391216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.