ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
Exploring sociodemographic moderators of the association between sleep duration and self-rated health.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study examined the association of sleep duration with self-rated health (SRH) and if age, sex, and race/ethnicity modifies this association.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional analysis of 396,455 adults who were aged ≥ 18 years in the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Sleep duration was categorized into three: short (< 7 h), normal (7-9 h; reference), and long (> 9 h). SRH was dichotomized into suboptimal (fair/poor; reference) and optimal (excellent/very good/good). Logistic regression models were employed to investigate the association and assess interactions of age, sex, and race/ethnicity with sleep duration.
resultsShort (adjusted odds ratio: 0.70 [95% confidence interval 0.66-0.74]) and long (0.65 [0.58-0.73]) sleep duration was associated with decreased odds of optimal SRH. There was a significant interaction between age and sleep duration (p = 0.029). The association between short sleep duration and SRH was strongest in the youngest age (18-24; 0.59 [0.47-0.74]), while 35-44 (0.57 [0.39-0.82] had the strongest association for long sleep duration with SRH. No significant interactions were found for sex (p = 0.314) or race/ethnicity (p = 0.930).
conclusionShort and long sleep duration are associated with decreased odds of optimal SRH among US adults. Prioritizing sleep hygiene across all ages may improve SRH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39627612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.