ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
The Primary Care Exception Rule in Internal Medicine Residency Clinic: Benefits, Disadvantages, Best Practices, and Recommendations for Reform.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Primary Care Exception During and After a Public Health Emergency.Family medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The outpatient continuity clinic experience is a crucial component of internal medicine residency training. While in many contexts the teaching physician must be physically present for key parts of the patient encounter, some outpatient environments qualify for use of the Primary Care Exception Rule (PCER), which allows indirect supervision of residents for low-complexity visits. Despite pervasive use of the PCER in resident continuity clinics, the literature regarding its effects on various stakeholders is limited. We are a working group of representatives from the Society of General Internal Medicine's Education and Clinical Practice Committees and Medical Resident Clinic Directors Interest Group. In this Perspective, we discuss the benefits and disadvantages of the PCER for patients, residents, attendings, and health systems. We also suggest best practices for its use: to wit, we advise against using the PCER when the history and/or physical exam is critical to the diagnosis and/or management of the patient's chief concern, and advocate for competency-based, rather than time-based, benchmarks for resident supervision under it. We make recommendations for PCER reform, most importantly expanding the PCER to moderate-complexity visits once competency-based assessments have been instituted. We conclude with future directions for research to improve application of the PCER.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.