Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627546›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025

The Primary Care Exception Rule in Internal Medicine Residency Clinic: Benefits, Disadvantages, Best Practices, and Recommendations for Reform.

Benjamin D Gallagher, Pamela D Vohra-Khullar, Stephen Fuest, Peggy B Leung, Shana Zucker, Erik X Tan, Margaret C Lo, David M Callender, Adelaide H McClintock, Craig F Noronha and 3 more

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Benjamin D GallagherSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. benjamin.gallagher@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5928-4525
Pamela D Vohra-KhullarDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Stephen FuestDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Peggy B LeungDivision of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Shana ZuckerDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Erik X TanDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Margaret C LoDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
David M CallenderDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Adelaide H McClintockDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Craig F NoronhaDepartment of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Erin N MarcusDepartment of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Yihan YangDepartment of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Everett, WA, USA.
Danielle JonesDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outpatient continuity clinic experience is a crucial component of internal medicine residency training. While in many contexts the teaching physician must be physically present for key parts of the patient encounter, some outpatient environments qualify for use of the Primary Care Exception Rule (PCER), which allows indirect supervision of residents for low-complexity visits. Despite pervasive use of the PCER in resident continuity clinics, the literature regarding its effects on various stakeholders is limited. We are a working group of representatives from the Society of General Internal Medicine's Education and Clinical Practice Committees and Medical Resident Clinic Directors Interest Group. In this Perspective, we discuss the benefits and disadvantages of the PCER for patients, residents, attendings, and health systems. We also suggest best practices for its use: to wit, we advise against using the PCER when the history and/or physical exam is critical to the diagnosis and/or management of the patient's chief concern, and advocate for competency-based, rather than time-based, benchmarks for resident supervision under it. We make recommendations for PCER reform, most importantly expanding the PCER to moderate-complexity visits once competency-based assessments have been instituted. We conclude with future directions for research to improve application of the PCER.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareHealth Care ReformInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyPrimary Health CareClinical CompetenceHumans

Identifiers

PMID39627546
PMCPMC12045908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.