ArticleScientific reports2024
Transformer-based transfer learning on self-reported voice recordings for Parkinson's disease diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and clinical translation of smartphone-based digital biomarkers for Parkinson's disease: a structured review.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- SPARROW: subtyping Parkinson's disease with agentic reasoning and robust omics workflow.NPJ artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Longitudinal voice biomarker trajectory modelling for Parkinson's disease severity: domain-adaptive transfer learning on mPower real-world smartphone data.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neurological Voice Disorders.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025Review
- Voice-Based Detection of Parkinson's Disease Using Machine and Deep Learning Approaches: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multi-Channel Spectro-Temporal Representations for Speech-Based Parkinson's Disease Detection.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Development of Neurodegenerative Disease Diagnosis and Monitoring from Traditional to Digital Biomarkers.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) techniques are becoming more popular for diagnosing Parkinson's disease (PD) because they offer non-invasive and easily accessible tools. By using advanced data analysis, these methods improve early detection and diagnosis, which is crucial for managing the disease effectively. This study explores end-to-end DL architectures, such as convolutional neural networks and transformers, for diagnosing PD using self-reported voice data collected via smartphones in everyday settings. Transfer learning was applied by starting with models pre-trained on large datasets from the image and the audio domains and then fine-tuning them on the mPower voice data. The Transformer model pre-trained on the voice data performed the best, achieving an average AUC of [Formula: see text] and an average AUPRC of [Formula: see text], outperforming models trained from scratch. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first use of a Transformer model for audio data in PD diagnosis, using this dataset. We achieved better results than previous studies, whether they focused solely on the voice or incorporated multiple modalities, by relying only on the voice as a biomarker. These results show that using self-reported voice data with state-of-the-art DL architectures can significantly improve PD prediction and diagnosis, potentially leading to better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.