ReviewForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025
Defining, exploring the sources and expressing post-mortem diagnostic uncertainty.
Review in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structuring medico-legal autopsy data for public health surveillance using the 11th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnostic uncertainty is a well-recognized concept in clinical practice, encompassing both technical perspectives and the subjective perceptions of physicians. Post-mortem diagnostics (PMD), which involves all post-mortem investigations to assess diseases and injuries and determine the cause of death, shares this inherent uncertainty due to the complexity and multidisciplinary nature of autopsies.
methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted to uncover relevant publications focusing on diagnostic uncertainty in PMD. An expert panel evaluated expressions and sources of diagnostic uncertainty to identify factors influencing PMD uncertainty.
resultsLiterature specifically addressing PMD uncertainty is sparse, though implicit and explicit references exist. This article illustrates the presence of uncertainty in PMD by drawing upon both literature and pathology practice. We introduce the definition of PMD uncertainty as "the inability to determine the exact cause of death and/or the precise significance of certain autopsy findings". PMD uncertainty can stem from a pathologist's subjective perception, but often results from several objective factors. Six factors inherent to the PMD setting were identified as contributing to this uncertainty. To systematically express the certainty of cause-of-death determinations, we developed a new Post-Mortem Diagnostic Certainty Scale (PMDCS) featuring eight categories, distinguishing between assignable and non-assignable causes of death.
conclusionUnderstanding and applying the concept of PMD uncertainty will enhance comprehension of the importance of certain post-mortem findings and improve the accuracy of autopsy result interpretation. While eliminating PMD uncertainty entirely is not feasible, standardizing investigations can reduce uncertainty, and using the PMDCS can improve the clarity of autopsy reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.