Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627482›Full record

ReviewForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025

Defining, exploring the sources and expressing post-mortem diagnostic uncertainty.

Wouter Van Den Bogaert, Lotte Alders, Joke Wuestenbergs, Elisabeth Dequeker, Wim Van de Voorde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wouter Van Den BogaertForensic Biomedical Sciences, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. wouter.vandenbogaert@uzleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-5803-3409
Lotte AldersBiomedical Research Institute (BIOMED), UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9071-7811
Joke WuestenbergsDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8155-4344
Elisabeth DequekerBiomedical Quality Assurance Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5383-3178
Wim Van de VoordeForensic Biomedical Sciences, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0048-5215

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnostic uncertainty is a well-recognized concept in clinical practice, encompassing both technical perspectives and the subjective perceptions of physicians. Post-mortem diagnostics (PMD), which involves all post-mortem investigations to assess diseases and injuries and determine the cause of death, shares this inherent uncertainty due to the complexity and multidisciplinary nature of autopsies.

methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted to uncover relevant publications focusing on diagnostic uncertainty in PMD. An expert panel evaluated expressions and sources of diagnostic uncertainty to identify factors influencing PMD uncertainty.

resultsLiterature specifically addressing PMD uncertainty is sparse, though implicit and explicit references exist. This article illustrates the presence of uncertainty in PMD by drawing upon both literature and pathology practice. We introduce the definition of PMD uncertainty as "the inability to determine the exact cause of death and/or the precise significance of certain autopsy findings". PMD uncertainty can stem from a pathologist's subjective perception, but often results from several objective factors. Six factors inherent to the PMD setting were identified as contributing to this uncertainty. To systematically express the certainty of cause-of-death determinations, we developed a new Post-Mortem Diagnostic Certainty Scale (PMDCS) featuring eight categories, distinguishing between assignable and non-assignable causes of death.

conclusionUnderstanding and applying the concept of PMD uncertainty will enhance comprehension of the importance of certain post-mortem findings and improve the accuracy of autopsy result interpretation. While eliminating PMD uncertainty entirely is not feasible, standardizing investigations can reduce uncertainty, and using the PMDCS can improve the clarity of autopsy reports.

Indexed as

Forensic PathologyUncertaintyAutopsyCause of DeathHumansAutopsyCause of deathDiagnostic uncertaintyPost-mortem diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID39627482
PMCPMC12325437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.