Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627437›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Development and validation of the Normalized Organoid Growth Rate (NOGR) metric in brightfield imaging-based assays.

Christophe Deben, Edgar Cardenas De La Hoz, Felicia Rodrigues Fortes, Maxim Le Compte, Sofie Seghers, Steve Vanlanduit, Hendrik Vercammen, Bert Van Den Bogert, Nelson Dusetti, Abraham Lin and 5 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Organoids glimpse: the nexus for diverse tumor heterogeneity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Beyond monolayers: a comparative analysis of 2D cell cultures and 3DFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Christophe DebenCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium. christophe.deben@uantwerpen.be.ORCID 0000-0001-8085-2040
Edgar Cardenas De La HozIndustrial Vision Lab, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Felicia Rodrigues FortesCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Maxim Le CompteCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Sofie SeghersCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Steve VanlanduitIndustrial Vision Lab, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Hendrik VercammenAntwerp Research Group for Ocular Science (ARGOS), Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Bert Van Den BogertAntwerp Research Group for Ocular Science (ARGOS), Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Nelson DusettiCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR 7258, Aix-Marseille Université and Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13288, Marseille, France.
Abraham LinCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Geert RoeyenCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Marc PeetersCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Hans PrenenCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8802-7352
Filip LardonCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Evelien SmitsCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on refining growth-rate-based drug response metrics for patient-derived tumor organoid screening using brightfield live-cell imaging. Traditional metrics like Normalized Growth Rate Inhibition (GR) and Normalized Drug Response (NDR) have been used to assess organoid responses to anticancer treatments but face limitations in accurately quantifying cytostatic and cytotoxic effects across varying growth rates. Here, we introduce the Normalized Organoid Growth Rate (NOGR) metric, specifically developed for brightfield imaging-based assays. A label-free image analysis model was applied to segment organoids precisely, track their growth rates over time, and classify viable and dead organoids. Testing eleven phenotypically distinct pancreatic cancer organoid models with five chemotherapeutics demonstrates that the NOGR metric more effectively captures cytostatic and cytotoxic drug effects compared to existing methods. This approach enhances the biological relevance of drug sensitivity assessments on organoids and offers a valuable tool for advancing personalized cancer treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsOrganoidsPancreatic NeoplasmsCell ProliferationDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID39627437
PMCPMC11615385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.