ArticleScientific reports2024
Employing machine learning models to predict pregnancy termination among adolescent and young women aged 15-24 years in East Africa.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Integrating aqli (rationale) and naqli (revealed) knowledge in AI-driven clinical decision support systems to enhance healthcare delivery for guiding termination of pregnancy among Muslim patients: a systematic review (1).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Determinants of modern family planning use among married adolescents in Bangladesh: evidence from a machine learning approach.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Identifying Key Predictors of Nursing Workload in Emergency Infusion Rooms: A Decision Tree Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting short birth intervals in Bangladesh using stacked machine learning and SHAP explainability: evidence from BDHS 2022.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Factors associated with prior pregnancy loss among multigravid women: a retrospective machine learning analysis from an African population cohort.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: An Updated Systematic Review of Their Role in Obstetrics and Midwifery.Cureus · 2025Review
- Beyond no harm: Advancing research on artificial intelligence for sexual and reproductive health and rights.npj women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnancy termination is still a sensitive and continuing public health issue due to several political, economic, religious, and social concerns. This study assesses the applications of machine learning models in the prediction of pregnancy termination using data from eleven national datasets in East Africa. Nine machine learning models, namely: Random Forests (RF), Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), AdaBoost, CatBoost, K-nearest neighbor, and feedforward neural network models were used to predict pregnancy termination, with six evaluation criteria utilized to compare their performance. The pooled prevalence of pregnancy termination in East Africa was found to be 4.56%. All machine learning models had an accuracy of at least 71.8% on average. The RF model provided accuracy, specificity, precision, and AUC of 92.9%, 0.87, 0.91, and 0.93, respectively. The most important variables for predicting pregnancy termination were marital status, age, parity, country of residence, age at first sexual activity, exposure to mass media, and educational attainment. These findings underscore the need for a tailored approach that considers socioeconomic and regional disparities in designing policy initiatives aimed at reducing the rate of pregnancy terminations among younger women in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.