ArticleEuropean radiology2025
The impact of 3D real-IR delayed post gadolinium MRI parameterisation on the diagnostic performance and optimal descriptor selection in Ménière's disease.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond FLAIR: PRISM (polarity-preserving real inversion solute mapping)-a new Frontier in real inversion recovery MRI for intracranial and sensory organ fluid assessment.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Substantially Higher Vestibular Hydrops Agreement in Older Patients Assessed by Non-contrast vs. Contrast-enhanced MRI: A Preliminary Study.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Article
- Global research trends in magnetic resonance imaging and Meniere's disease: A bibliometric and visualized study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the performance and optimal combination of MRI descriptors used for the diagnosis of Ménière's disease (MD) between a real-IR sequence with "zero-point" endolymph (ZPE), and an optimised real-IR sequence with negative signal endolymph (NSE). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective single-centre cross-sectional study evaluated delayed post-gadolinium ZPE and NSE real-IR MRI in consecutive patients with Ménièriform symptoms (8/2020-10/2023). Two observers assessed 14 MRI descriptors. "Definite MD" (2015 criteria) and "all MD" ears (wider clinical criteria) were compared to controls. Cohen's kappa and risk ratios (RR) were evaluated for each descriptor. Forward stepwise logistic regression established which combination of descriptors best predicted MD.
resultsThe study included 132 patients (57 men; mean age 57.7 ± 13.6), with 87 "all MD" (56 "definite") and 39 control ears. The NSE sequence demonstrated increased perilymph SNR, and improved both diagnostic performance and reliability for 9/14 descriptors. However, ZPE demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for the best descriptor of "saccule absent, large as or confluent with the utricle" (RR 6.571, ZPE; 6.300, NSE) and that of "asymmetric perilymphatic enhancement" (RR 3.628, ZPE; 2.903, NSE). Both sequences combined these two descriptors in the optimal predictive model for "definite MD", with "grade 2 cochlear hydrops" also significant for NSE. ZPE and NSE descriptor combinations both correctly classified 95.8% of ears. The ZPE descriptor combination performed better for "all MD" (ZPE, AUC-ROC 0.914; NSE, AUC-ROC 0.893).
conclusionParameter optimisation with NSE Real-IR influenced the optimal selection of MRI descriptors but did not improve their diagnostic performance in definite MD. KEY POINTS: Question Delayed post-gadolinium ZPE (FLAIR) and NSE (REAL-IR) sequences are widely applied for diagnosing MD, but their relative benefits remain unclear. Findings Optimised NSE sequences improve perilymphatic depiction and influence the selection of the optimal MRI descriptors, but do not improve diagnostic performance. Clinical relevance Radiologists may continue to apply either ZPE or NSE sequences since they offer similar diagnostic abilities, but the choice of the sequence will influence which MRI features should be evaluated to support the diagnosis of MD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.