ArticleScientific reports2024
Development and validation of electronic health record-based, machine learning algorithms to predict quality of life among family practice patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effectiveness of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Healthcare Service Quality Metrics: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Identifying Key Factors in University Students' Physical and Mental Health: An Integrated Regression and Machine Learning Approach.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Using the cancer aging and research group- breast cancer (CARG-BC) predictive model in older adults (OA) with early breast cancer: an external validation study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Medical laboratory data-based models: opportunities, obstacles, and solutions.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health-related quality of life (HRQol) is a crucial dimension of care outcomes. Many HRQoL measures exist, but methodological and implementation challenges impede primary care (PC) use. We aim to develop and evaluate a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm that predicts binary risk levels among PC patients by combining validated elements from existing measures with demographic data from patient electronic health records (eHR) to increase predictive accuracy while reducing prospectively-collected data required to generate valid risk estimates. Self-report questions from previously validated QoL surveys were collected from PC patients and combined with their demographic and social determinant (SD) data to form a 53-question item bank from which ML chose the most predictive elements. For algorithm development, 375 observations were allocated to training (n = 301, 80%) or test partitions (n = 74, 20%). Questions that asked participants to rate how happy or satisfied they have been with their lives and how easy or hard their emotional health makes work/school showed a good ability to classify participants' mental QoL (98% max balanced accuracy). Questions that asked participants to rate how easy or hard it is to do activities such as walking or climbing stairs and how much pain limits their everyday activities showed ability to classify physical QoL (94% max balanced accuracy). No demographic or SD factors were significantly predictive. Supervised machine learning can inform QoL measurements to reduce data collection, simplify scoring, and allow for meaningful use by clinicians. Results from the current study show that a reduced 4-question model may predict QoL almost as well as a full-length 40-question measure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.