ArticleBone marrow transplantation2025
Better pre-transplant treatment options for TP53-mutated MDS: cytoreductive or non-cytoreductive therapy?
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequential therapy with decitabine and an XPO-1 inhibitor followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in MDS with biallelic TP53 inactivation patients : a preliminary case series.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Article
- A proposal for expedited stem cell transplantation for TP53-mutant myelodysplastic neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemia.Blood advances · 2026Article
- The prognostic impact of myeloid co-mutation burden in TP53-mutated AML/MDS after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter retrospective analysis.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with TP53-mutated myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) have unfavorable prognoses; the benefit of cytoreductive treatment before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is debated. We retrospectively analyzed 284 MDS patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT; among which 49 had TP53 mutation, with 38 receiving cytoreduction and 11 treated exclusively with best supportive care (BSC) before transplantation. Regardless of TP53 allelic state, patients with mutated-TP53 had a lower overall survival rate and higher relapse rate than those with wild-type TP53 (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Among the TP53-mutated cohort, the 2-year overall survival rate in the cytoreduction group was comparable to that in the BSC group (34.6% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.53), and no other prognostic benefit was observed as well (all P < 0.05). Moreover, no prognostic difference was found among the chemotherapy subgroup, hypomethylating agent subgroup, and BSC subgroup (all P > 0.05). Patients in the pre-HSCT measurable residual disease (MRD) negative subgroup, pre-HSCT MRD-positive subgroup, and BSC subgroup exhibited similar prognoses (all P > 0.05). Multivariate analyses showed that pre-HSCT cytoreduction was not associated with post-transplant survival (all P > 0.05). In conclusion, TP53-mutated MDS patients have poor post-HSCT outcomes; compared to BSC, pre-HSCT cytoreduction doesn't improve prognosis, even in those with MRD negative before transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39627346What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.