ArticleScientific reports2024
Perampanel reduces seizure frequency in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy for a long term.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced therapeutic potential of paeoniflorin and vitamin B12 in intracerebropeduncle ethidium bromide-induced multiple sclerosis-like pathology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Perampanel, Brivaracetam, Cenobamate, Stiripentol, and Ganaxolone in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seizures in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are often highly resistant to various antiseizure medications. Perampanel (PER) is a novel antiseizure medication that non-competitively inhibits the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor and is expected to reduce seizure frequency not only for focal seizures and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) but also for other seizure types. This study aimed to clarify the long-term therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of PER in patients with DEEs. We analyzed data regarding patients' background characteristics, medication retention, trends in seizure frequency, and adverse events obtained from 24 patients with DEEs who had been on PER treatment for 60 months. The retention rates were 62.5% and 46.9% at 12 and 60 months, respectively. At 60 months after PER initiation, the rate of patients with > 50% seizure reduction was 33.3%, 33.3%, 38.5%, 54.5%, 54.5%, and 36.4% among patients with atypical absence seizures, tonic seizures, focal seizures, GTCS, myoclonic seizures, and atonic seizures, respectively. The frequency of adverse events was 70.8%. PER showed long-term efficacy in various seizure types. PER is a promising treatment option for patients with DEEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.